Peroral vocal fold augmentation provides the patient an opportunity for permanent or temporary vocal fold augmentation under local anesthesia, obviating a trip to the operating room and general anesthesia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17797/q995b29rk7
Awake per-oral vocal fold injection with Calcium Hydroxyapatite
Vocal fold paralysis, vocal fold paresis, vocal fold atrophy, vocal fold scar, sulcus vocalis, soft tissue loss of the vocal fold(s)
(1) Unstable cardiopulmonary status; (2) Inability to tolerate procedure under local anesthesia (eg. hyperactive gag response or high level of anxiety); (3) Inability to visualize the larynx adequately during the time of injection; (4) Inadequate mouth opening (at least 2-cm intermaxillary distance); (5) Use of anticoagulants (relative contraindication).
The procedure is typically performed with one assistant while the patient sits upright in a chair.1,2 Additional details and educational information for laryngology assistants can be found in the article by Mallur and Rosen.1
Pre-procedure vital signs are taken, including heart rate and blood pressure. Generally a patient is not considered a suitable candidate for unsedated procedures if he or she is anxious and having a difficult time tolerating diagnostic flexible laryngoscopy. A sensitive gag reflex may also preclude the patient from having an unsedated procedure. Other factors to consider include the patient’s anatomy and general health status. The patient must have a sufficiently patent nasal passage to allow a channeled laryngoscope (outer diameter 5.0mm) to pass through. For patients who require cardiopulmonary monitoring, the procedure can be performed in an endoscopy suite or in the OR with continuous monitoring capabilities.
Ideal injection site is anterior to the vocal process along the superior arcuate line. For vocal fold atrophy, the injection can be performed at mid-fold along the superior arcuate line. For vocal fold scar or vocal fold soft tissue loss, injection can be tailored to the vocal fold deficient site.
Advantages: An awake, per-oral injection in the clinic or OR setting allows patients to avoid general anesthesia. There is no need to be NPO before the procedure. However, patients need to be NPO for 2 hours after the procedure given the degree of laryngeal anesthesia administered. The patient is unsedated, thus he or she can drive to and from the clinician’s office before and after the procedure. Post-surgical recovery time is less compared to procedures performed in the OR, which translates into less missing time from work or school. Further, since the procedure is performed with the patient completely awake and in the upright position, vocal fold augmentation can be tailored to optimize the patient’s voice result by intermittently testing the voice throughout and at the completion of the procedure.
Disadvantages:
Epistaxis from passing the laryngoscope through the nares, vasovagal reaction, superficial injection, lateral injection into the paraglottic space resulting in insufficient augmentation, inferior injection into the subglottis.
Epistaxis from passing the laryngoscope through the nares, vasovagal reaction, superficial injection, lateral injection into the paraglottic space resulting in insufficient augmentation, inferior injection into the subglottis.
N/A
1. Mallur PS, Rosen CA. Techniques for the laryngology assistant: providing optimal visualization. Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology. 2012; 23(3): 197-202.
2. Rosen CA, Simpson CB. (2008). Operative Techniques in Laryngology. Berlin, Germany. Springer.
3. Mallur PS, Rosen CA. Vocal fold injection: review of indications, techniques, and materials for augmentation. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 3(4): 177-82.
This video shows a transotic approach for a cochlear schwannoma in a 59-year-old female who presented with sudden sensorineural hearing loss in her left three years prior. She was found to have subsequent growth of her tumor on imaging and elected to undergo surgery. The transotic approach is a valuable approach within the armamentarium of a skull base team and differs from the transcochlear approach in the handling of the facial nerve. Techniques for ear canal overclosure, eustachian tube packing and mastoid obliteration are also highlighted.
Here, we have a 39 yrs old female with complaints of noisy breathing for last two years post thyroidectomy. Flexible laryngoscopy confirmed bilateral vocal cord paralysis. She was planned for coblation assisted cordectomy.
Patient was taken up for procedure under general anaesthesia. She also started having stridor after induction. Nasopharyngeal intubation with spontaneous breathing technique was used. Entropy leads were placed over forehead to monitor the depth of anaesthesia. Tube position was confirmed with endoscopic view and Benjamin lindohlm laryngoscope was suspended. As the patient was spontaneously breathing, the stridor became more prominent, with stable vitals and the procedure was continued. The vocal cord retractor was fixed and coblation wand was then used with 7:3 settings for ablation and coagulation respectively. The surgical limits were-anteriorly the junction between ant 2/3 and post 1/3 of the vocal cord, posteriorly just anterior to the vocal process of arytenoid to prevent cartilage exposure and post operative granulations. Superely till the ventricle and inferioly till the medial most surface of the subglottis. Laterally approx. 5 mm depth was defined to prevent injury to the superior laryngeal artery branch and further bleeding. Once the final airway was achieved , the topical lignocaine was used to prevent laryngeal spasm post extubation.
The patient was shifted to the ward without oxygen, the voice was assessed on post op day 2.
Patient was called for follow up on post op day 14th and good voice outcomes were achieved.
So lets have a look on some tips & tricks for the safe procedure—–
Nasopharyngeal insufflation technique with entropy monitor will give adequate and safe surgical field
2. Appropriate exposure will help you to delineate the surgical margins
3. Topical anaesthesia before and after the procedure will prevent sudden laryngeal spasm
4. Firm holding of coblation device will help to prevent injury to surrounding structures like anterior 2/3 vocal cord, opposite side vocal cord, medial surface of vocal cord or aryteroid posteriorly
5. Do not ablate more laterally to prevent bleeding, if at all it happens, use patties or coagulation switch for hemostasis.
6. And at the end of the procedure ,use catheter suction to suck out blood clots or saline from the airway if any….
To Conclude-Coblation Assisted Cordectomy( CAC) can be performed safely with good outcomes in case of bilateral vocal cord paralysis using tubeless anesthesia technique without tracheostomy !
We present the harvest of a osteocutaneous fibula free flap for head and neck reconstruction performed at the University of Cincinnati. This reconstructive technique has a wide variety of implications but has found greatest utility in the reconstruction of mandibular defects.
Review Awake per-oral vocal fold injection with Calcium Hydroxyapatite.